If a man could understand all the horror of the lives of ordinary people who are turning around in a circle of insignificant interests and insignificant aims, if he could understand what they are losing, he would understand that there can only be one thing that is serious for him - to escape from the general law, to be free.
What can be serious for a man in prison who is condemned to death? Only one thing: How to save himself, how to escape: nothing else is serious.
-G.I. Gurdjieff
Many religious traditions speak of life as a sort of prison. From the Eastern Buddhist concept of Samsara and the Hindu goddess of illusion, Maya, to the Western Gnostic concept of the Demiurge, these traditions imply that we live entrapped on a plane of illusory existence, with the inherent goal of breaking free.
This naturally begs the question: what exactly are we breaking free FROM, and where exactly do we escape TO?
The answer seems to be that we don't actually escape anything except our own illusory beliefs. As many Buddhists have said, "Samsara is Nirvana," meaning that the prison we seek to escape is precisely the place we arrive at once we truly awaken.
Nothing changes, yet everything changes. This paradox mirrors the mystical Christian notion that heaven and hell are not distant realms we enter after death, but states of being we create here and now through our own consciousness.
This is certainly intriguing, but it leaves us with a practical question: if we are indeed in a prison with nowhere else to go, what exactly are we supposed to do about it?
One answer might lie in the archetypes of illusion themselves. One of the oldest archetypes of illusion is the Hindu goddess Maya. Hindu philosophy speaks of Brahman and Atman: Brahman being the universal whole, and Atman the individual self. Hindu teachings assert that Atman is Brahman, echoing the Buddhist insight that Samsara is Nirvana.
Maya is the goddess of illusion who convinces Atman that it is separate from Brahman. She weaves intricate illusions to obscure Atman's inherent unity with the divine.
Similarly, in Gnostic lore, the Demiurge is the architect of illusion, commanding an army of archons to keep humanity from the wisdom of the goddess Sophia and the wholeness of the one true God (the Monad or the Absolute).
When multiple traditions teach such strikingly similar concepts, it often indicates a common underlying truth. Thus, we must ask: why do these gods of illusion exist, and how do we become free of them?
Let's address each question separately. Regarding why they exist, I believe it relates to the universe functioning like a mirror. One key insight is that the universe itself is conscious, and therefore inherently intelligent, as consciousness is the fundamental nature of reality. This singular consciousness permeates all existence, and each of us is a fractal reflection of this universal awareness. Consequently, the universe mirrors externally what we project internally.
It is within this internal projection of reality that the gods of illusion reside. Because we consciously or unconsciously believe ourselves to be separate, the intelligent universe reflects this belief back to us, reinforcing our illusion of separateness.
This force is extraordinarily powerful and difficult to overcome. Gurdjieff once said:
As soon as a man awakens for a moment and opens his eyes, all the forces that caused him to fall asleep begin to act upon him with tenfold energy and he immediately falls asleep again, very often dreaming that he is awake or is awakening.
Could the strength of this illusory force be influenced by the structure of the universe itself? If, as Rupert Sheldrake suggests, that memory is inherent in the universe and that the laws of the universe are not inherent laws so much as habits of the universe, then that suggests that the illusory view of reality are not inherent but habitual patterns built up over time. If this is true, our illusory view of reality is not inherent but rather a deeply ingrained habit built up over countless generations.
No wonder Samsara is so challenging to escape—we are literally contending with the accumulated momentum of nature's habitual memory!
Thus, we are essentially fighting two battles simultaneously: first, our personal unconscious belief systems, and second, the collective unconscious or morphic fields inherited from our ancestors. Combine these deeply entrenched beliefs with the infinite mirroring intelligence of a conscious universe, and you have the powerful archetypes of illusion such as Maya or the Demiurge.
Now, the crucial question arises: how do we actually free ourselves from these archetypes and realize that Samsara is Nirvana?
One practical approach is to operate as if these archetypes are real, even while knowing their appearance is itself part of the illusion. This method is helpful because it provides a personal, story-driven perspective. Instead of battling illusion as an abstract concept, you engage with an intelligent opponent who never sleeps and constantly seeks to lure you back into your prison cell.
Of course, this battle itself is illusory—you're ultimately confronting your own unconscious belief structures. However, because these beliefs are so deeply rooted in our psyche, we often have no idea how deep the rabbit hole goes until we see it manifest in our lives. Maintaining constant awareness of this internal struggle and having a symbolic adversary to engage with provides a meaningful narrative. Yet, it's crucial to remain flexible and able to drop the battle when necessary, lest we become like Don Quixote, endlessly tilting at imaginary windmills.
Another method of combating illusion is to set up a series of "alarm clocks," as Gurdjieff called them. These are triggers designed to awaken you to the fact that you've fallen asleep. For example, for me personally, suffering serves as a trigger. If I feel internal discomfort, I can generally assume that either I was figuratively asleep or acted unconsciously in the past, leading to this discomfort. This realization prompts me to awaken. Different triggers can be established for various circumstances. However, as Gurdjieff explains, their effectiveness eventually diminishes as they become habitual, necessitating the continual creation of new alarm clocks.
Yet another way to transcend illusion is not to fight at all—in other words, to surrender. This surrender is not nihilistic resignation but rather a relinquishing of the illusion of control, recognizing that the universe is perfect exactly as it is.
As Adyashanti beautifully states:
The deepest feeling of a compassion that does not seek to alter anything, paradoxically, alters everything
This brings us full circle to the idea that heaven and hell are internal states, and that Samsara was Nirvana all along. When we accept reality as it is, viewing ourselves and the world with unconditional compassion, we begin to see clearly. We allow the infinite intelligence of the universe's mirror to operate freely, unburdened by our resistance.
In conclusion, the journey from illusion to awakening is not a physical escape from one place to another, but rather a profound shift in perception. It is a journey inward, toward recognizing our inherent unity with the divine and the universe itself.
By understanding the nature of illusion, consciously engaging with it, setting intentional triggers for awakening, and ultimately surrendering to the perfection of reality, we discover that the freedom we seek has always been present. The prison door was never locked; it was our own beliefs that kept us confined.
Awakening, then, is not about changing the world around us, but about transforming our relationship with it—realizing that the paradise we seek is already here, waiting patiently within our own hearts.
Very interesting. I agree with your conclusion. For me (not to say I'm "enlightened"), awakening feels like flipping inside out. The inside becomes the outside, and the outside becomes you. Then, it's just your body and the environment in total conversation. No more tricks of the mind's inner dialogue whispering your life story and how it defines "you." No more feelings of social and ontological isolation. No more fear.
But the world can sing me back to sleep if I am not vigilant. Am I awake for good this time? Probably not until I drop the whole notion of awake and asleep altogether, because as soon as we say to ourselves "I'm awake!" we can be damn sure we are fast asleep.
The prison door was never locked; it was our own beliefs that kept us confined. Our beliefs are like a combination lock we often have forgotten the code to.